What Every Programmer Should Know About Memory
Long, technical, and worth every page: Drepper walks the whole memory hierarchy like someone who genuinely wants you to understand caches, not just fear them. Still the reference.
view similar →Long, technical, and worth every page: Drepper walks the whole memory hierarchy like someone who genuinely wants you to understand caches, not just fear them. Still the reference.
view similar →Naur's claim is that a program is really a theory living in the heads of the people who built it, and the code is only its residue. It explains why a codebase goes senile the moment that team scatters, source perfectly intact.
view similar →The short paper behind Conway's Law: you ship your org chart whether you mean to or not. Sixty years later, teams keep rediscovering that their software has the shape of their meetings.
view similar →The paper that introduced Unix, written by the two people who built it and plainly enjoying how much they'd managed to leave out. A masterclass in what simplicity buys you, straight from the source.
view similar →Brooks separates the complexity that's essential to a problem from the kind that's just our tools getting in the way, then argues no single trick will ever kill the first. The most quietly disappointing — and durable — essay in software.
view similar →Knuth's Turing lecture, making the case that programs can be beautiful and that caring about that is not a distraction from the engineering. From the person who then spent fifty years proving it.
view similar →Wigner asks why mathematics invented for its own sake keeps turning out to describe the physical world, and refuses to pretend the coincidence is explained. The puzzlement is the gift.
view similar →Anderson's argument that knowing the rules for the parts tells you almost nothing about the whole — that each scale of nature has its own laws. The four pages that gave emergence its backbone.
view similar →Thurston, a great geometer, describing how mathematics actually advances — through shared understanding, not just formal proof. Unusually generous about the kinds of knowing that resist being written down.
view similar →Coase asks the question nobody thought to ask — if markets are so efficient, why do companies exist at all? — and answers it with the cost of transacting. A whole field grew out of taking an obvious fact seriously.
view similar →An economist who'd been a prisoner of war describes the cigarette-based economy that formed in the camp, complete with prices, inflation, and a middleman. Theory written from inside the thing it explains.
view similar →Akerlof shows how, when sellers know more than buyers, the good used cars quietly disappear from the market. A tiny everyday example that turned out to explain insurance, credit, and hiring.
view similar →Nothing here yet. Try another search or clear the filter.