William P. Thurston
Thurston, a great geometer, describing how mathematics actually advances — through shared understanding, not just formal proof. Unusually generous about the kinds of knowing that resist being written down.
Read itmathematicsunderstandingproof
Paul Lockhart
Lockhart loves mathematics enough to be furious about how school murders it — drilling the notation of a thing while hiding the thing itself. The anger isn't a flaw in the argument; it's the evidence.
view similar →Francis Su
Su's farewell address as president of the MAA, arguing that mathematics answers human longings — for beauty, for play, for justice. Warmer and more humane than the subject usually permits itself to be.
view similar →W. T. Gowers
Gowers on the real divide between problem-solvers and theory-builders, written from inside by someone fluent in both. It's a quiet defense of the kind of mathematics that doesn't collect the prizes.
view similar →Jacques Hadamard
Hadamard surveyed working mathematicians on how they actually have ideas, and got answers closer to dreams and hunches than to logic. More anthropology than mathematics, and the better for it.
view similar →G. H. Hardy
Hardy's defense of pure mathematics, written as his own powers were fading, candid about ambition, beauty, and growing old. It survives because it's so personal it nearly hurts to read.
view similar →George Pólya
Pólya on how mathematicians guess before they prove — the analogical, fumbling middle that finished theorems hide. A rare look at the thinking before the thinking gets cleaned up.
view similar →